Journal of Management & Systems (TSSCI)
Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
Revised and approved at the Second Executive Editorial Meeting of 2026 (2026.3.21).
Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
Management & System is committed to the highest standards of academic integrity. We believe that rigorous ethics are the foundation of knowledge and scientific progress. All editors, reviewers, and authors must follow this ethical statement. This statement follows the core practices of COPE, Elsevier, and the Journal of Management and Business Research. It provides clear guidance to ensure a fair and transparent research environment.
Duties and Obligations of Authors
- Research Originality and Publication Norms
Authors must submit original research results that have not been published elsewhere. The manuscript must not be under review by any other journal or publication. Any form of duplicate submission or redundant publication is strictly prohibited. Authors should clearly cite and reference their previous works if the current study is related. Excessive self-citation to artificially manipulate citation rates must be avoided.
- Research Integrity and Data Accuracy
Authors bear full responsibility for the authenticity and accuracy of their research data. All data must be presented truthfully without any fabrication or falsification of results. Authors must not intentionally delete data that contradicts their research hypotheses. The research methods and analysis should be described in detail to ensure reproducibility. Authors must disclose study limitations and immediately notify editors if major errors are found.
- Authorship and Attribution of Contributions
All listed authors must make a substantial intellectual contribution to the research work. This includes participating in the research design, data analysis, or manuscript revision. Individuals who only provide funding or general supervision should not be listed as authors. These contributors may be mentioned in the acknowledgment section of the paper instead. The corresponding author ensures that all co-authors approve the final version for submission.
- Plagiarism and Use of Generative AI
Plagiarism of text, ideas, or data without proper citation is strictly prohibited. Self-plagiarism, or reusing one’s own published work without citation, is also forbidden. Authors using generative AI tools are responsible for verifying all produced content. They must review and modify AI output to ensure academic accuracy and integrity. AI tools cannot be listed as authors and their use must be disclosed. If AI was used only for language editing or proofreading, no declaration is required.
- Declaration of Conflict of Interest
Authors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest during the submission process. This includes financial relationships, personal ties, or academic competition with others. These factors might influence the judgment of editors or reviewers regarding the research. All potential conflicts should be clearly explained to the editorial office at submission. This transparency helps maintain the fairness and credibility of the publication.
- Protection of Research Subjects
Research involving humans or animals must follow relevant ethical and legal requirements. Authors must obtain informed consent from all human participants in the study. They must also protect the privacy and identity of these research subjects. Proof of approval from an ethics committee must be clearly stated in the manuscript. This ensures that the research process respects the rights and safety of subjects.
Duties and Obligations of Reviewers
- Professionalism, Objectivity, and Timeliness
Reviewers must evaluate manuscripts based on their professional expertise regarding academic value and methodology. They should provide objective and fair assessments of the original contribution and clarity of arguments. Review comments must remain constructive and free from personal bias or individual attacks. If a reviewer feels unqualified or cannot meet the deadline, they should notify the editor immediately. This prompt communication helps maintain the efficiency and quality of the peer-review process.
- Principle of Confidentiality
Manuscripts received for review are confidential documents that must be protected from unauthorized disclosure. Reviewers must not reveal the content or details of the review to any third parties. They are strictly prohibited from using the manuscript’s content for their personal research activities. Furthermore, reviewers must not upload the manuscript or any review details into generative AI systems. Maintaining confidentiality is essential to protect the intellectual property rights of the authors.
- Avoidance of Conflict of Interest
Reviewers must recuse themselves if they identify any potential conflicts of interest with the research. This includes recent collaborations, academic competition, or previous advisor-student relationships with the authors. Reviewers should inform the editorial office as soon as a potential conflict is recognized. This transparency is necessary to ensure the fairness and integrity of the evaluation process. Avoiding conflicts of interest preserves the credibility of the journal and the scholarly record.
- Alerting Academic Misconduct
Reviewers are responsible for notifying the editor if they suspect any signs of academic misconduct. This includes potential data fabrication, plagiarism, or instances of redundant and duplicate publication. They should provide specific evidence or supporting citations to justify their ethical concerns. Prompt reporting allows the editorial team to take the necessary investigative steps. Such vigilance helps protect the academic community from unethical and fraudulent research practices.
Duties and Obligations of Editors
- Independence and Fairness in Editorial Decisions
The editorial team holds the final authority for accepting or rejecting all submitted manuscripts. These decisions are based entirely on academic merit, originality, and feedback from peer reviewers. Editors must ensure that non-academic factors, such as nationality or gender, do not influence decisions. The relevance of the work to the journal’s specific scope is also a primary consideration. Independent judgment is vital for maintaining the academic standards and reputation of the journal.
- Confidentiality and Anonymous Review
Editors and editorial staff must keep the identities of authors and reviewers strictly confidential. The journal implements a double-blind peer-review system to ensure objective and unbiased scientific evaluations. Unauthorized use of unpublished research data for personal gain is strictly prohibited for all staff. This anonymity helps prevent social or institutional biases from affecting the assessment of the research. Every member of the editorial office is bound by these strict confidentiality requirements.
- Management of Conflict of Interest
Editors should recuse themselves from managing any manuscripts that present a potential conflict of interest. Clear mechanisms are established for submissions from editorial board members or the Editor-in-Chief. In such cases, an external expert or another editor will manage the entire review process. This separation ensures that internal relationships do not influence the final editorial outcome. Managing conflicts of interest is essential for maintaining public trust in the publication process.
- Maintenance of Review Quality
Editors are responsible for selecting qualified reviewers and monitoring the quality of their professional feedback. They have the authority to remove inappropriate personal comments from the final reviewer reports. If review opinions show significant divergence, editors may seek additional expert advice for clarification. This process ensures that authors receive a fair and balanced evaluation of their scholarly work. High-quality reviews contribute directly to the continuous improvement of the research we publish.
- Handling Academic Misconduct
The editorial office is responsible for investigating all allegations of academic or research misconduct. These investigations are conducted according to the guidelines provided by the COPE organization. If misconduct is confirmed, the journal will take appropriate actions to correct the academic record. Possible measures include publishing corrections, statements of concern, or formal article retractions. This commitment to integrity protects the reliability and value of the scientific literature.
Duties and Obligations of the Publisher
- Maintaining the Integrity of the Scholarly Record
The publisher assumes final responsibility for the permanence and integrity of the scholarly record. We ensure that all published articles are properly preserved for long-term access. Our organization is committed to preventing academic misconduct from damaging the credibility of scholarly literature. The publisher works closely with editors to establish clear policies for corrections, retractions, and expressions of concern. These policies strictly follow the best practice guidelines provided by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
- Supporting Editorial Independence
The publisher respects and defends the editorial independence of the editorial team. Manuscript selection, review, and final acceptance are determined solely by editors based on their academic judgment. These decisions remain entirely free from pressure by any commercial or interest groups. We provide the necessary resources and support to help editors fulfill their professional duties. This ensures that the editorial process remains independent and free from outside interference.
- Oversight and Handling of Academic Misconduct
The publisher is responsible for establishing robust mechanisms to address and investigate allegations of academic misconduct. We support the editorial office in conducting fair and timely investigations into issues like plagiarism or data fabrication. When ethical concerns arise, the publisher provides the guidance needed to resolve these cases. We take decisive measures based on investigation results to protect the reputation of our publications. This oversight ensures that academic integrity remains the core value of our publishing activities.
- Conflict of Interest Management and Transparency
The publisher develops and enforces clear conflict of interest policies for authors, editors, and reviewers. We ensure that commercial considerations, such as advertising or sponsorships, are completely separated from editorial decisions. All parties involved in the publication process must disclose any potential conflicts that might affect their objectivity. This transparency helps maintain the trust of the academic community and the public. Our commitment to transparency ensures that all editorial choices are based purely on scientific merit.
This website is sponsored by
Research Institute for the Humanities and Social Sciences, National Science and Technology Council.