The mission of the Corporate Management Review aims at developing new knowledge to fields of business and management by publishing research articles on managerial practices in work and organizational settings.

We are internationally oriented and welcome submissions rooted in empirical and theoretical research across all fields related to business and management including (but not restricted to):

Corporate social responsibility
Human resource management
International business
Organizational behavior

For contributors, the following two files should be submitted electronically by e-mail (
1. Title page with all authors’ names, affiliations, and e-mails.
2. Anonymous manuscript without any identifying information about authors.

Prepare manuscripts according to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th edition). Submission fee or publication fee is NOT required.

Review process

All papers submitted to Corporate Management Review undergo a rigorous editorial and double-blind peer review process. Authors are requested not to put their name(s) in the manuscript. Each paper is reviewed firstly by an Associate Editor based on the journal's conceptual aspects and academic contribution potential. After the above requirements are confirmed, the paper is assigned to double-blind peer review process by the Editorial Board. Based on the comments of the review process, the Associate Editor makes an editorial recommendation. All aspects of the review process are overseen by the Editor, who executes the final editorial decisions.


All papers submitted to Corporate Management Review should be declared the current manuscript has not been published before or been under consideration for publication with another journal.

If a submitted paper is accepted for publication in Corporate Management Review, authors are required to submit a copyright form. This agreement with the transfer or license of the copyright to Corporate Management Review and authors retain significant rights to reuse and share their published paper.

Double-blind review policy

Corporate Management Review will accept submissions in double-blind review format only. Articles submitted should not be concurrently under consideration at another journal. Author names and affiliations should appear in a separate title page but not anywhere on the manuscript. Authors should do their level best to check that the manuscript itself contains no clues to their identities.

Manuscript preparation

Prepare manuscripts according to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th edition). Manuscripts may be copyedited for bias-free language. Below are examples concerning the preparation of abstract, keywords, references, etc.

Abstract and keywords

All manuscripts must have an abstract containing a maximum of 250 words. Up to five keywords or brief phrases should be provided after the abstract.

Tables and figures

Since tables and figures are considerably more expensive to prepare for publication than text, please carefully consider what they add to your manuscript’s impact. Please place each table or figure on a separate page after the reference section. Number tables and figures consecutively (one series for tables, one for figures) from the beginning to the end of the article. Indicate the position of each in the text as follows:
Insert Table 2 about here

Example references

It is necessary to summarize an alphabetically ordered list of the works you have cited in your article.
1. Journal Article:
 Grady, J. S., Her, M., Moreno, G., Perez, C., and Yelinek, J. (2019). Emotions in storybooks: A comparison of storybooks
   that represent ethnic and racial groups in the United States. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8(3), 207–217.
  • Parenthetical citation: (Grady et al., 2019)
  • Narrative citation: Grady et al. (2019)

2. Whole authored book:
 Jackson, L. M. (2019). The psychology of prejudice: From attitudes to social action (2nd ed.). American Psychological
  • Parenthetical citations: (Jackson, 2019)
  • Narrative citations: Jackson (2019)

3. Whole edited book:
 Kesharwani, P. (Ed.). (2020). Nanotechnology based approaches for tuberculosis treatment. Academic Press.
 Torino, G. C., Rivera, D. P., Capodilupo, C. M., Nadal, K. L., and Sue, D. W. (Eds.). (2019). Microaggression theory:
   Influence and implications
. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Parenthetical citations: (Kesharwani, 2020; Torino et al., 2019)
  • Narrative citations: Kesharwani (2020) and Torino et al. (2019)

4. Chapter in an edited book:
 Aron, L., Botella, M., and Lubart, T. (2019). Culinary arts: Talent and their development. In R. F. Subotnik,
   P. Olszewski-Kubilius, and F. C. Worrell (Eds.), The psychology of high performance: Developing human
   potential into domain-specific talent
(pp. 345–359). American Psychological Association.
 Dillard, J. P. (2020). Currents in the study of persuasion. In M. B. Oliver, A. A. Raney, and J. Bryant (Eds.),
   Media effects: Advances in theory and research (4th ed., pp. 115–129). Routledge.
 Thestrup, K. (2010). To transform, to communicate, to play—The experimenting community in action. In E. Hygum and
   P. M. Pedersen (Eds.), Early childhood education: Values and practices in Denmark. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
  • Parenthetical citations: (Aron et al., 2019; Dillard, 2020; Thestrup, 2010)
  • Narrative citations: Aron et al. (2019), Dillard (2020), and Thestrup (2010)


Do not place acknowledgements into the manuscript in the blind review process. If authors wish to acknowledge the contribution of individuals or institutions that are not authors, they are welcome to do so by including the acknowledgements in the Title page.


The appendices elaborate lengthy but useful methodological details, such as explanations and presentations of the factor analysis of measures for survey instruments. Centered and bold-faced capital letters should be used in the title of each appendix.

Ethical principles

It is a violation of research ethics to publish articles based on the primary data that have been previously published. Authors are required to absolutely follow the standards of APA Ethical Principles. Authors are requested to have their data available throughout the editorial review process and for at least 5 years after the date of publication. Authors must confirm that they have complied with APA ethical standards in the treatment of all their sample subjects, and describe the details of treatment as ethical.

If you experience any problems, please contact:
Corporate Management Review
(ISSN: 1028-7310)